Death of the (Paid) Author?

The London Times reports a great deal of panic on the part of British writers as they contemplate the gradual demise of the longstanding business model associated with print books. E-books legitimate and illegitimate are apparently the main culprit, or at least the main cause of fear. Writers note that digital piracy is rampant, not unlike the problems that the artists associated with the music industry have been complaining about for several years.

Google is doing something that appears more legitimate since it’s pursued by a big company, but if the universal library is successful without any form of compensation for writers, it’s hard to see what incentive will continue to exist for compensating writers at all.

Of course, it’s hard to remember now, but the “professional” writer who makes his or her living by the word is a relatively new invention. Samuel Johnson was, perhaps, the first, and was a rarity then. Writers used to be people who did their work as moonlighting, or because they had the money and the time, or else as officials of the court. In a more ancient vein, poets were troubadours, making their money through performance rather than through commodities.

I wonder whether we are entering a period when the very idea of a professional writer is coming to an end. And I’m not sure whether to be sanguine about that or not. I’m not a member of the cult of the amateur, even though I value anyone writing whatever may be on their minds and imagination. Still, there’s something to be said about the tradition of craftsmanship, the guild of writers that, at its best, professionalization managed to maintain on some level. Of course, there’s always been a lot of crap out there, but I’m not certain that craftsmanship will maintain the same aura in digital forms.

Maybe. Maybe.

4 thoughts on “Death of the (Paid) Author?

  1. Cliff Burns

    I’ve just posted my supernatural mystery/occult thriller novel on my blog in its entirety so questions of payment, professional ownership and copyright have been much on my mind of late. In the end, what it comes down to is I want people to have the opportunity to be exposed to my work, to see for themselves if it’s worthy. I’ve been a pro writer for 20+ years and I’ve tried the conventional publishing route–it’s broken, too many good books getting passed over, too many bad books making it into print. The new technologies offer a remedy: I’ve got my own site, basically my own little publishing company. I print what I want, when I want and (occasionally) get paid for it. In the past year, I’ve had thousands of readers pop by to read my work. And I need publishers, agents and editors WHY?

  2. briandosborne

    I share your concerns and think that the British copyright act of 1710 (8 Anne c.19)got it right when it granted copyright “for the encouragement of learned men to compose and write useful books.”

  3. Tiffany

    Interesting article about blogging in NY Times this weekend:

    “…the evolution of the ‘pay-per-click’ economy has put the emphasis on reader traffic and financial return, not journalism.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s