A new survey of 225 employers just out emphasizes the continuing value of the liberal arts in the employment market.
More interesting, at least for those of us who got some parental grief over our college choice, was the apparent love being shown for liberal arts majors. Thirty percent of surveyed employers said they were recruiting liberal arts types, second only to the 34 percent who said they were going after engineering and computer information systems majors. Trailing were finance and accounting majors, as only 18 percent of employers said they were recruiting targets.
“The No. 1 skill that employers are looking for are communication skills and liberal arts students who take classes in writing and speaking,” said Dan Schawbel, founder of Millennial Branding and an expert on Generation Y. “They need to become good communicators in order to graduate with a liberal arts degree. Companies are looking for soft skills over hard skills now because hard skills can be learned, while soft skills need to be developed.”
via Survey On Millennial Hiring Highlights Power Of Liberal Arts – Daily Brief – Portfolio.com.
I don’t particularly like the soft skills/hard skills dichotomy. However, this fits my general sense, blogged on before, that the hysteria over liberal arts majors lack of employability is, well, hysteria. Something manufactured by reporters needing something to talk about.
At the same time, I think the somewhat glib and easy tone of this particular article calls for some caution. Digging in to the statistics provided even in the summary suggests that liberal arts majors need to be supplementing their education with concrete experiences and coursework that will provide a broad panoply of skills and abilities. 50% of employers, for instance, say they are looking for students who held leadership positions on campus, a stat before which even engineers and computer scientist but kneel in obeisance. Similarly, nearly 69% say they are looking for coursework relevant to the position you are pursuing. My general sense is you can sell you Shakespeare course to a lot of employers, but it might be helpful if you sold Shakespeare along side the website you built for the course or alongside the three courses you took in computer programming.
Generally speaking, then, I think these statistics confirm the ideas propounded by the Rethinking Success conference in suggesting that students really need to be developing themselves as T-shaped candidates for positions, broad and deep, with a variety of skills and experiences to draw on and some level of expertise that has been, preferably, demonstrated through experiences like internships or project-based creativity.
Speaking of Rethinking Success, the entire website is now up with all the relevant videos. The session with Philip Gardner from Michigan State is embedded below. It was Gardner who impressed me by his emphasis that students need to realize that they either need to be liberal arts students with technical skills or technical students with liberal arts skills if they are going to have a chance in the current job market.
I agree that Philip Gardiner was the most impressive speaker on this panel. I have to say that Steve Nelsons frequent use of the word hustle or hustler really irritated me. He is a self confessed hustler so I would not be inclined to put too much weight on anything he hasd to saty. If an organisation simply responded to ‘hustlers’ it would quickly go out of business. In my experience (career of over 30 years in Broadcasting) the hustler usually turns out to be the the weakest link in an enterprise. I am reading Susan Cain’s ‘Quiet’ and it has some very interesting research on the extrovert – hustlers are usually extroverts – and the introvert and what they contribute to humanity at large.